Skip to content
Unit 13Compliance and EnforcementChapter 1: Concepts related to compliance and enforcement
Chapter 1

Concepts related to compliance and enforcement

After World War II something astonishing happened: The number of international agreements grew rapidly, despite the prevailing understanding that states are primarily guided by their own interests and that international agreements are rapidly abandoned when they become inconvenient. Compliance was often attributed to a coincidence of interests or to power alignments. From today’s perspective, however, the predominant pattern of compliance with international agreements, even with limited enforcement, suggests that states comply when there is a need to address common problems that cannot be solved unilaterally and that reasons other than self-interest might induce compliance. Before we go into more detail, however, an awareness of some basic terms and their definitions is needed.

Distinction between the technical and political dimensions

The success or failure of verification, compliance and enforcement measures depend as much on political factors as on technical ones, despite the tendency to take political reality and power relations for granted.5 The willingness of states to comply, the effectiveness of enforcement measures and the robustness of verification processes are all influenced by political realities within and between states. Enforcement of international mechanisms depends on the political alignment of and agreement between the relevant actors, which can be difficult to achieve. For example, the effectiveness of the UN Security Council (UNSC) as a political organ that recommends and adopts measures for peace and security depends on the political unity of its permanent members and the body can be rendered powerless in cases of disagreement due to the veto power. Similarly, verification measures are usually more effective when there is the political will to support transparency and cooperation.

Footnotes

  1. Dunworth, Treasa. 2019. “Compliance and Enforcement in WMD-related Treaties”, WMD Compliance & Enforcement Series, No. 1, UNIDIR, available at: https://unidir.org/files/2019-12/WMD%20CE%20-%20Paper%201%20v2.pdf.

  2. Simmons, Beth. 1998. “Compliance with International Agreements”, in: Annual Review of Political Science 1: 75–93.

  3. Simmons. “Compliance with International Agreements”

  4. Chayes, Abram/Handler Chayes, Antonia. 1991. “Compliance without Enforcement: State Behavior under Regulatory Treaties”, in: Negotiation Journal 7: 311–330, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000433

  5. Short, Jodi L. 2021.“The Politics of Regulatory Enforcement and Compliance: Theorizing and Operationalizing Political Influences”, in: Regulation & Governance 15: 653–85, https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12291.